Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

The first step in any functional safety effort is to conduct a thorough hazard identification and risk assessment. This involves systematically analyzing all possible failure modes and faults that could occur within a system and determining the potential consequences. Factors like equipment types, components, interfaces, environmental conditions, human interactions and external events must be considered. Quantitative risk assessment methods are often used to determine likelihood and severity of any hazards. The results form the basis for subsequent safety requirements and risk reduction measures.

Implementing Preventive Measures

Once hazards and risks are fully understood, the next stage is implementing effective preventive measures. This involves both hardware and software design strategies to avoid hazardous states from occurring in the first place or reduce their probability. Common techniques include redundancy, separation, diversity, self-monitoring, error detection and correction codes. Complex Programmable Logic Controllers (CPLCs) systems often incorporate features like watchdog timers, memory protection and permissions to enhance reliability. Environmental controls and physical asset protections also play a role. The goal is designing "fail-safe" rather than "fail dangerous" behavior.

Detection and Response to Failures

Even with preventive efforts, random hardware faults or operational errors may still cause failures. Therefore, Functional Safety systems emphasize early failure detection and appropriate responsive actions. Strategies like self-diagnostics, discrepancy monitoring across redundant channels, and integrity checks on sensors and peripherals can rapidly detect anomalies. Well-defined failure modes need to be linked to pre-defined safe states. This may involve generating alarms, initiating automatic safe stops or transitions to backup modes of operation. Well-tested safety logic solvers ensure proper response sequences are carried out.

Verification of Safety Requirements

Rigorous verification activities are a must to confirm safety requirements have been properly implemented before systems are deployed. Techniques such as failure modeling and simulation check for detection and response behavior. Specialized functional safety tests inject specific faults to activate safety mechanisms. FMEAs systematically analyze every potential failure path. Lifecycle management with modification controls and periodic health checks ensure requirements remain valid over the long term as systems evolve or age. Standards like IEC 61508 provide guidance on verification methods and their required rigor based on a system's risk class.

Safety Instrumented Functions

Within functional safety frameworks, critical control and monitoring functions are specifically designated as "safety instrumented functions" or SIFs. These have the most stringent requirements for reliability, integrity and tolerable failure rates. SIFs incorporate additional design features to achieve the necessary safety integrity levels (SILs) confirmed through quantitative safety analyses. Some key aspects of SIFs include:

- Hardware redundancy - Often dual or triple modules operating independently are employed for high reliability functions.

- Diagnostics - Robust self-diagnostics detect exactly 50% of random hardware faults for 2oo3 voting configurations.

- Proof testing - Periodic functional testing validates safety mechanisms are still effective.

- Hardware fault tolerance - Circuits can tolerate a predefined number of faults without jeopardizing the safety function.

- Functional testing - Rigorous factory acceptance testing verifies proper operation.

Get more insights on Functional Safety