Qualitative research plays an indispensable role in advancing healthcare knowledge, and Capella University's RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 1 Developing a Research Question for Qualitative Studies—Applied Qualitative Analysis—is structured to deepen students’ grasp of qualitative methodologies. This course focuses on understanding, designing, analyzing, and applying qualitative research strategies in nursing and healthcare. Across its four assessments, students are exposed to the full lifecycle of a qualitative study, from formulating a research question to evaluating methodological frameworks.
In this comprehensive 3000-word guide, we explore RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 1: Developing a Research Question for Qualitative Studies, Assessment 2: Research Theory for Qualitative Studies, Assessment 3: Data Analysis Strategies for Qualitative Research, and Assessment 4: Analyzing Methodological Approaches to Apply in Qualitative Research. These assessments form the backbone of your development as a qualitative researcher in the nursing domain.
RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 1: Developing a Research Question for Qualitative Studies
Developing a well-focused research question is the cornerstone of a qualitative study. In Assessment 1, students are expected to craft a research question that is open-ended, exploratory, and aligned with a qualitative inquiry.
Understanding the Nature of a Qualitative Research Question
Unlike quantitative studies that measure variables and test hypotheses, qualitative research delves into lived experiences, perceptions, and social phenomena. A qualitative question should prompt exploration rather than numerical analysis. For instance, instead of asking, “How many nurses experience burnout?” a qualitative approach would ask, “How do nurses experience and cope with workplace burnout?”
In RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 1, students are guided to create a research question that addresses a gap in current literature and is feasible for qualitative analysis. The question must align with a chosen phenomenon of interest, the population being studied, and the intended setting.
Selecting the Phenomenon and Justifying the Inquiry
The next crucial step involves choosing a phenomenon that is both meaningful and researchable within the qualitative paradigm. It could relate to patient experiences, healthcare disparities, leadership challenges, or professional ethics in nursing practice. Students are encouraged to justify their selection using current literature and to explain why a qualitative lens is best suited to explore this issue.
Incorporating Literature Review Insights
Assessment 1 also requires integrating findings from a preliminary literature review. By analyzing how previous studies framed similar topics, students gain insight into refining their question and ensuring it is both original and valuable. The integration of scholarly references enhances the credibility of the research focus.
RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 2: Research Theory for Qualitative Studies
Assessment 2 shifts focus to the theoretical underpinnings of qualitative research. Here, students explore philosophical foundations and select appropriate qualitative theories or frameworks to guide their study.
The Role of Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research
Theoretical or conceptual frameworks provide a lens through which researchers view their RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 2 Research Theory for Qualitative Studies . These frameworks influence data collection, interpretation, and presentation. Common frameworks include phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, and case study.
In RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 2, students must identify and justify the use of a theoretical or conceptual framework that aligns with their research question. For example, if the study aims to explore the lived experience of ICU nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic, phenomenology might be the most appropriate framework.
Ontological and Epistemological Foundations
Students are required to reflect on their own research philosophy. Understanding ontology (the nature of reality) and epistemology (the nature of knowledge) is crucial. These beliefs shape how researchers engage with participants and interpret data.
A student adopting a constructivist stance, for instance, believes that knowledge is co-constructed between the researcher and participants. This belief would influence the choice of framework and how findings are analyzed.
Connecting Frameworks to Methodology
Theoretical alignment ensures that all aspects of the research—from question to data collection and interpretation—are cohesive. In Assessment 2, students present a rationale for selecting their framework, discuss how it fits their study, and cite scholarly sources that support its use in similar research contexts.
RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 3: Data Analysis Strategies for Qualitative Research
After formulating a research question and identifying the guiding framework, Assessment 3 challenges students to explore and apply appropriate data analysis strategies for qualitative research.
Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis
Unlike quantitative analysis that relies on statistical software, qualitative analysis involves identifying patterns, themes, and narratives from textual data. This might include interview transcripts, focus group discussions, field notes, or journal entries.
In RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 3 Data Analysis Strategies for Qualitative Research, students review various coding methods such as open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. They learn to identify recurring ideas and develop categories that reflect the deeper meaning of participants’ experiences.
Manual and Software-Assisted Coding
Students are introduced to both manual and digital coding techniques. While manual coding offers more immersion in the data, software like NVivo or ATLAS.ti can enhance the rigor and organization of large datasets.
Assessment 3 encourages students to consider the pros and cons of each method and to justify their choice. They are expected to walk through a step-by-step analysis plan: from data preparation to thematic interpretation.
Maintaining Rigor and Trustworthiness
A major emphasis in Assessment 3 is maintaining research rigor. Concepts such as credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability are explored. Students must describe how they will ensure trustworthiness through methods like member checking, audit trails, and reflexivity journals.
For example, member checking—returning findings to participants to confirm accuracy—enhances credibility. Reflexivity helps students recognize their own biases and how these may influence the interpretation of data.
RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 4: Analyzing Methodological Approaches to Apply in Qualitative Research
RSCH FPX 7868 Assessment 4 Analyzing Methodological Approaches to Apply in Qualitative Research the capstone of the course, bringing together all prior learning. Students critically evaluate and select a qualitative methodology that best suits their research topic and question.
Overview of Qualitative Methodologies
Students explore methodologies such as:
- Phenomenology – Understanding the essence of lived experiences.
- Grounded Theory – Developing a theory grounded in data.
- Ethnography – Studying cultures and social interactions.
- Case Study – In-depth exploration of a single case or bounded system.
- Narrative Inquiry – Analyzing stories to uncover meaning.
Each methodology carries distinct assumptions, data collection techniques, and analysis procedures. Students must compare these approaches and select one that aligns with their study’s goals.
Justifying the Methodological Choice
A core component of Assessment 4 is defending the selected methodology. Students explain why their topic lends itself to that method and how it complements the theoretical framework and research question developed earlier.
For instance, if the research question centers on how nurse leaders experience ethical dilemmas, a narrative inquiry could allow participants to share stories that reveal deep insights into personal and professional values.
Ethical Considerations and IRB Requirements
Assessment 4 also covers research ethics. Students must demonstrate understanding of informed consent, confidentiality, and participants' rights. Preparing for IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval is also discussed, ensuring ethical compliance in real-world research.
Integration and Application: Becoming a Skilled Qualitative Researcher
Completing all four assessments in RSCH FPX 7868 prepares students to confidently design and conduct a full-scale qualitative research project. Each step—question formulation, theoretical framework selection, data analysis planning, and methodological alignment—builds foundational skills essential for nursing research and evidence-based practice.
Reflection on Scholarly Growth
Throughout the course, students develop not only academic competencies but also critical thinking and ethical reasoning. These capabilities are vital for leadership roles in nursing where research informs decision-making and policy development.
Students also learn the importance of self-reflection, especially in qualitative research, where the investigator is the instrument of inquiry. By acknowledging personal biases and maintaining transparency, researchers uphold the integrity of their findings.
Conclusion
The RSCH FPX 7868 course is a transformative journey for nursing professionals committed to deepening their understanding of qualitative inquiry. Through its structured assessments—Assessment 1: Developing a Research Question, Assessment 2: Theoretical Frameworks, Assessment 3: Data Analysis, and Assessment 4: Methodological Approaches—students become adept at navigating the complex landscape of qualitative research.
Each assessment not only strengthens specific research skills but also integrates into a comprehensive skillset that enables students to conduct meaningful, ethical, and methodologically sound studies. These competencies are crucial for advancing nursing science, informing practice, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
For those embarking on RSCH FPX 7868, embracing each assessment with curiosity and rigor will ensure both academic success and professional growth as a qualitative researcher in the healthcare field.
Comments
0 comment